skip to sub menu skip to main content
united states homeour firmbusiness issuesservicesideas and researchnews

INSIDER

  October 2006 Issue


 
INSIDER SECTIONS
 Back Issues    Contact Us    Subscribe  
Insider Home
Pension Plans
Defined Contribution Plans
Health Care
Asset Management
Social Security and Medicare
Compensation
IRS Rules and Regulations
ERISA
Other Rules and Regulations
Case Law
Retirement Income
WW Research

PPA Combines Stricter Rules With New Savings Opportunities for Defined Contribution Plans
The Pension Protection Act of 2006 offers defined contribution plan sponsors new opportunities within a more demanding regulatory framework. The act permanently extends important retirement savings and IRA provisions that were scheduled to expire in 2010, and endorses and encourages automatic enrollment arrangements.


 
   
PPA Delivers Good News for Cash Balance and Other Hybrid Plans
The Pension Protection Act clarifies — primarily prospectively — that cash balance and other hybrid defined benefit plans are not inherently age discriminatory. The act clarifies the age-discrimination standard for defined benefit plans in general and establishes new rules for “applicable defined benefit plans.”

IRS Finalizes Heinz Anti-Cutback Regulations
The IRS has issued final anti-cutback regulations that adopt the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Central Laborers’ Pension Fund v. Heinz. In that case, the court ruled that ERISA’s anti-cutback rule prohibits any change to a pension plan’s suspension-of-benefits rules that would reduce benefits for employees who continued working after retirement (see Watson Wyatt Insider, August 2004).

PPA Establishes New Rules for Multiemployer Plans
The Pension Protection Act of 2006 imposes new rules on multiemployer plans, including shorter amortization periods for many liabilities, more stringent requirements for underfunded plans in endangered or critical status, and more demanding disclosure requirements. The changes, which generally take effect in 2008, will affect contributing employers, plan trustees, participants and beneficiaries.

Ten Key Points About the SEC’s New Disclosure Rules
On August 11, 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission published 436 pages of executive compensation proxy disclosure rules. Companies must comply with those rules in their proxy statements for fiscal years ending on or after December 15, 2006.

IBM Plaintiffs’ Request for Rehearing Denied
The request of plaintiffs in the Cooper v. IBM case for a rehearing by the entire Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals has been denied. (The appeals court recently ruled that hybrid plans are not inherently age-discriminatory; see Watson Wyatt Insider, August/September 2006.) In a one-page order, the court noted that all three of the judges who heard the case voted to deny rehearing, and none of the other judges on the circuit requested a vote on the petition.

IRS Delays Effective Date for 403(b) Regulations
The IRS has delayed the general effective date for the regulations regarding section 403(b) arrangements that were proposed in 2004 (including the related controlled group regulations under section 414(c)).

IRS Finalizes 404(k) Regulations on Deductions for ESOP Payments
The IRS has finalized part of the regulations proposed last year under section 404(k) concerning the deduction for dividends paid on employer securities held by an employee stock ownership plan (ESOP). Under the final regulations, payments that redeem employer securities in an ESOP should not be treated as dividends for purposes of section 404(k) and are not deductible.

Governmental “Pick-Up” Plans Require Formal Adoption
In Revenue Ruling 2006-43, the IRS clarifies the designation required by an employing governmental unit in order to “pick up” employee contributions. In a pick-up plan, the Code allows governmental employers to “pick up” mandatory employee contributions, which are then treated as nontaxable employer contributions instead of taxable employee contributions.

EEOC Proposes Regulatory Changes Recognizing General Dynamics v. Cline
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has proposed regulations revising its position on the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) and discrimination against younger workers. The revisions respond to the Supreme Court’s decision in General Dynamics v. Cline, which interpreted the ADEA as permitting employers to favor older workers over younger workers. The revisions are mostly clarifications and minor changes to the text.

Most Viewed Articles
IRS Releases Grab Bag of Guidance on Pension Distributions
DOL Issues Final Regulations on Timing of QDROs
Looking Into the FASB’s Crystal Ball: What’s Ahead for Liability Measurement?
Default Investment Options in Defined Contribution Plans: A Simple Comparison



Download Latest Edition

October 2006


INSIDER Flash

 • Accounting Proposal Would Require More Postretirement Benefit Disclosure


FEATURED:
ACCOUNTING REFORM


 • IASB Paper on Retirement Benefit Accounting Being Watched Around the World
 • Recent Developments Regarding Global Accounting Convergence and FASB Restructuring
 • U.K. Recommendations Could Have Significant Effects on Pension Accounting Worldwide
 • Accounting proposal would require more postretirement benefit disclosure


FEATURED:
PENSION AND SOCIAL SECURITY REFORM AROUND THE WORLD


 • Partially Prefunding the Canadian Public Pension Plans: Lessons for the United States?
 • Recent Developments in Pension Plans in the Netherlands
 • Recent and Prospective Developments in Retirement Programs in the United Kingdom
 • Developments in Retirement Programs in Spain


Other Articles of Interest from Watson Wyatt
 • Employers Enhancing 401(k)s To Compensate for Retirement Plan Changes, Watson Wyatt Finds
 • More Companies, Workers Adopt Consumer-Directed Health Plans