|
This article discusses four recent studies conducted by Watson Wyatt Worldwide
in the areas of human resources practices, disability management, executive
pay and the effective use of strategic rewards. Some of the results confirm—or
at least build on—results of previous studies, but others are counterintuitive,
flying in the face of conventional wisdom.
The Watson Wyatt
Human Capital Index™
Companies that have superior human capital practices create superior returns
for their shareholders. That is the primary finding of the first ever Watson
Wyatt Human Capital Index.
The study found that a significant improvement in 30 key human capital practices
is associated with a 30 percent increase in market value. The 30 practices
identified in the study were grouped into five key dimensions: recruiting excellence;
clear rewards and accountability; a collegial, flexible workplace; communications
integrity; and prudent use of resources.
The year-long study was based on a comprehensive analysis of human resources
practices at 405 publicly traded U.S. companies with at least three years of
total returns to shareholders (TRS) and a minimum of $100 million in revenue
or market value. The survey data was matched to objective financial measures
of a company's value, including its market value, three- and five-year TRS,
and its Tobin's Q (a company's stock market value plus its long-term debt divided
by the replacement cost of its assets). Following a series of sophisticated
statistical analyses, including factor analysis and multiple regression, each
company was given a Human Capital Index score on a scale of 1 to 100.
The study shows a strong relationship between human capital practices and
shareholder value creation over both the short and long term. Over a five-year
period, TRS was nearly twice as much for high-index companies (103 percent)
compared to companies with a low index (53 percent). Over the most recent six-month
period following the survey (January-June 1999), high-index companies reported
28 percent TRS versus a negative 6 percent return for companies with a low
index.
Figure 1
*One standard deviation.
Source: Watson Wyatt Worldwide.
According to the study, certain practices that conventional wisdom applauds,
such as 360-degree feedback and general training programs, are actually linked
to lower market value. These counterintuitive findings are grouped together
in the fifth dimension of the index called the Prudent Use of Resources. While
there may be nothing inherently wrong with these practices, they are frequently
implemented in misguided ways. Prevalence of these programs did not correlate
with added economic value but rather was associated with a 10 percent decrease
in market value. The data suggests that companies who choose to implement these
practices must be very prudent with resources, both human and financial.
To learn more about Watson Wyatt's Human Capital Index, please visit Research
and Reports at www.watsonwyatt.com/homepage/res.htm or call 1-800-388-9868.
Staying@Work®:
Focusing on What Works in Integrated Disability Management
The fourth annual Washington Business Group on Health/Watson Wyatt survey on
improving employees' health and productivity through integrated disability
management finds employers at a crossroads. This year we can identify the winning
activities employers have engaged in to successfully reduce disability-related
costs while keeping employees healthy and at work. Furthermore, those employers
that have integrated multiple activities across occupational and non-occupational
disability programs have seen the best disability management investments.
But our survey also finds that disability costs are still climbing for many
employers, suggesting some misdirected efforts, increasing disability rates
or both—and reflecting continued opportunities for improvement.
Figure 2
*One standard deviation.
Source: Watson Wyatt Worldwide.
Other survey highlights include:
- The total average costs for workers'
compensation, sick pay, short-term disability (STD) and long-term disability
(LTD) as a percentage of payroll were 6.3 percent, up slightly from 6.1
percent in the 1998/99 survey.
- The
indirect costs of disability also continue to rise. Total average costs
for overtime, replacement employees and workstation/job accommodations
stand at 8 percent of payroll, up from 6.7 percent last year. The jump
is almost entirely due to the rising cost of replacing employees in a tight
labor market.
- The four most cost-effective disability
management activities are transitional and modified return-to-work (RTW)
programs, case management, behavioral health interventions and independent
medical exams.
- Twenty-five percent of companies
with RTW programs saw declines in their LTD costs. No company without such
a program saw a decline in LTD costs.
To learn more about the new Staying@Work survey, to download specific data cuts,
to examine case studies or to participate in an online discussion of how to improve
the effectiveness of disability management programs, please visit www.stayingatwork.com.
Executive Pay
in 2000: Superior Pay for Superior Performance
U.S. executive pay, especially CEO pay, continues to generate controversy.
In general, the media believes we have gone beyond appropriate limits.
Others, including most institutional investors and Watson Wyatt, believe
that the way U.S. executives are paid is a source of significant international
competitive advantage. That is, the structure and size of executive pay opportunities
have helped drive superior economic performance at individual U.S. companies
and for the entire U.S. economy.
While it is true that CEO pay levels are very high by everyday standards
and that some companies do not pay fairly for performance, Watson Wyatt believes
that there is a strong and very real relationship between CEO pay and performance.
In this year's study, we found that:
- High levels of CEO stock ownership
(excluding stock options) are related to superior levels of financial performance,
including TRS, Return on Equity (ROE), Earnings per Share (EPS) growth
and Tobin's Q.
- High levels of CEO total pay and
changes in CEO cash compensation are highly related to TRS.
Figure 3

S ource:
Watson Wyatt Worldwide.
In addition to examining the relationship between CEO pay and shareholder
returns, the report also looks at broad trends in executive pay practices,
from average salary increases to the size of stock option grants.
To learn more about the new Executive Pay survey report, please visit Research
and Reports at www.watsonwyatt.com or call 1-800-388-9868.
Strategic Rewards® 1999/2000
The
new employer-employee deal of the 1990s has been replaced with a myriad of
deals for 2000 and beyond. The new deal of the 1990s taught employees to
see themselves as free agents. In one sense, employers are reaping what they
have sown as companies have moved away from the model of career employment
and asked employees to forego loyalty in return for transportable skills.
At the same time, the realities of baby boom demographics—a dramatic shortfall
in the number of new entrants into the workforce—suggest an imminent labor
supply crunch. We have had almost two decades of maximizing shareholder value
partially through an abundance of labor. As this abundance is fading rapidly
into shortage, the balance of power in the employment relationship has shifted
from corporate consumers of labor to its suppliers—employees.
What many companies still don't understand is that different employees require
different people strategies—or different ìdealsî—to attract, retain and motivate
them. Companies that see their people strategy as a source of competitive advantage
and back it up with carefully put together reward plans are outperforming companies
that don't by a margin of more than two-to-one.
Figure 4
Source: Watson Wyatt Worldwide.
Other survey highlights include:
- Forty-five percent of respondent
companies do not have a formal recruitment strategy, yet 80 percent reported
moderate or great difficulties in attracting critical-skill employees.
- The desire to maintain a good reputation
at work is the most effective motivator for 81 percent of top-performing
employees.
- Opportunities for advancement, job
redesign and learning new skills are the three non-compensatory rewards
most valued by top-performing employees.
- Top-performing employees say dissatisfaction
with benefits, conflicts with co-workers/supervisors, an unpleasant work
environment and lack of time for personal affairs have a far greater impact
on their decision to resign than companies realize.
- For companies where top performers
believe that true pay for performance is practiced, average total shareholder
returns during the period 1996-1998 were 112 percent. This compares to
80 percent for companies whose employees believe it is not.
To learn more about the new Strategic Rewards survey report, please visit Research
and Reports or
call 1-800-388-9868.
November 1999
|